Home Blog Page 55

Fans Wonder if Former ‘Wizards of Waverly Place’ Star Dan Benson Is Actually Closing His OnlyFans Account

0

Former Wizards of Waverly Place star Dan Benson has announced that he is stepping away from his adult entertainment career by shutting down his OnlyFans account, a decision he made after reflecting on his past actions and personal motivations. Benson, who became widely known for his role as Zeke Beakerman on the Disney Channel show, opened up about his choice in a recent TikTok video that has since been deleted.

Benson’s venture into adult content started in 2022 after private photos of him were leaked online. Initially, he turned to OnlyFans as a way to regain control of the narrative and support his financial needs, including paying medical bills for his elderly dog. However, in the TikTok post, Benson admitted that, after several years in the adult industry, the experience had started to take a toll on him, leading him to reconsider his path forward.

“I think I’m done,” Benson said in the video. “When I made the decision to start an OnlyFans page, I thought I was doing it for the right reasons. I was doing it to support financially my elderly dog that needed a lot of financial help with his medical bills. I was tired of being so poor and feeling like I was being taken advantage of. I don’t know. I think after years of doing this, it’s starting to weigh on me and I’m going to pull away for a while and take some time to reflect.”

The 37-year-old actor, who has gained a significant following on social media since his departure from the Disney Channel spotlight, went on to express his gratitude for his fans’ support. He also hinted that he may explore returning to acting or seeking a more traditional job. However, given that Wizards of Waverly Place has been rebooted with many of its original cast members, it seems unlikely that Benson would reprise his role, especially given his adult content history. He has previously acknowledged that Disney, which maintains a family-friendly image, would likely not welcome his return due to his adult film career.

“Thank you to everyone who has supported me this whole time,” Benson continued. “I might go back to acting. I might just go and try and get a normal job and disappear. Just be a normal person. I don’t really know. I hope I can remove some of the stuff that is already out there. So if you’re thinking about doing this, just be thoughtful, because I know it’s going to be really hard.”

Although Benson has made the decision to shut down his OnlyFans, as of February 6, his account remained active. However, he has since continued to engage with his audience on other platforms, including X (formerly Twitter), where he posted a spicy video just days after his announcement. It appears that while he’s stepping away from adult content, Benson is not completely disappearing from the public eye just yet.

Benson’s journey into the adult entertainment industry has been a controversial one, especially given his former Disney Channel fame. Many fans were shocked to learn that the actor, known for his wholesome role on Wizards of Waverly Place, had started creating adult content online. However, Benson has repeatedly emphasized that his decision was financially motivated, driven by the need to support his family, and that he never anticipated the personal and public challenges that would follow.

Now, as he steps away from the adult industry, Benson is reflecting on the impact his choices have had on his life and his career. It remains to be seen what direction he will take next, but for now, he seems focused on stepping back and considering his future options, whether they involve a return to acting, pursuing a “normal” job, or continuing to live a more private life away from the public eye.

In the coming months, fans may get a better sense of what Benson’s next steps will be as he takes the time to regroup and reflect.

Museum Adds ‘Mature Content’ Warning to Exhibit with Painting of Two Cowboys Kissing

0

Two queer artists of color are speaking out after the Amon Carter Museum of American Art in Fort Worth, Texas, placed a “mature content” warning on an exhibition featuring their work. The exhibition, titled Cowboy, includes a multidisciplinary installation by artists Rafa Esparza and Fabian Guerrero. While the exhibit does not contain any explicit sexual images, the artwork features gay representation, which the artists believe is the source of the controversy.

Esparza and Guerrero’s piece, titled Querías Norte, is part of the Cowboy exhibition, which aims to challenge traditional portrayals of the American cowboy. At the center of their installation is Esparza’s painting al Tempo, which depicts two dark-skinned men in cowboy hats sharing a kiss while dancing together. Both men are fully clothed, and the image focuses on their emotional connection rather than any explicit content.

The Cowboy exhibition, which includes works by 28 artists, reexamines the mythology of the cowboy, exploring themes of masculinity, gender, and identity. The museum’s press release for the exhibition highlights its goal to disrupt the stereotype of the cowboy as a White, cisgender male figure, presenting a more diverse range of interpretations across different communities. The show seeks to reflect a broader understanding of the cowboy and what it represents in modern culture.

Despite the exhibition’s inclusive mission, the museum initially faced controversy soon after the exhibit opened on September 28, 2023. According to reports from the Fort Worth Reporter, the museum temporarily closed the exhibition with no explanation. When the exhibition reopened, a “mature content” warning sign was placed at the entrance, along with a QR code allowing visitors to preview the artwork before entering.

The museum’s decision to issue the warning, without providing specific details about which works it considered to be “mature content,” has sparked criticism. Notably, the museum did not issue similar warnings for other parts of the exhibit that feature nudity or violent imagery. Texas art publication Glasstire reported in October that the museum also removed promotional banners and billboards advertising the Cowboy exhibition. Furthermore, the museum reportedly canceled several family-oriented programs and events that were originally planned around the exhibit. As of late January, signage advertising Cowboy was absent from the museum’s exterior, and the exhibition is scheduled to run through March 23, 2025.

While the museum has not disclosed the specific works that prompted the content warning, sources within the institution suggested that complaints regarding the sexual identity depicted in the exhibit contributed to the decision. During a Zoom meeting with the museum’s curators, Esparza and Guerrero were told that some museum visitors had expressed discomfort with the LGBTQ+ content of the exhibition. Staff members at the museum reportedly expressed surprise at the decision to close the exhibit temporarily and relaunch it with the content warning.

A museum spokesperson issued a statement acknowledging the controversy, explaining that the decision to add the warning was made to “give visitors a chance to preview the works in advance.” The museum emphasized that it strives to consider community feedback and suggested that the changes were made in response to concerns raised by visitors. Additionally, the museum indicated that some family and homeschool events related to the exhibition had been adjusted to reflect the feedback.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Fabian Guerrero (@fei_bian)

Esparza, in an interview with KERA, called the content warning “a form of censorship,” pointing out that the decision seemed to target their artwork simply because it portrayed two men dancing together. He questioned why a depiction of a Black cowboy or a woman riding a horse would not warrant a similar warning, calling the situation absurd. “What would it feel like for an artist if someone came in and said, ‘Hey, I’d love to invite you to see the show, but I have to warn you, you’re going to see a painting of a Black cowboy,’” Esparza remarked during an artist talk at the museum.

Guerrero echoed Esparza’s sentiments, stating that museums should create space for queer joy and celebration, especially when the content of their work is not harmful. “Our project is just two men dancing together, and there’s no harm in that,” he said. Guerrero also pointed out that museums frequently display works that deal with themes of slavery and colonization, yet queer narratives and expressions of love are often relegated to the margins.

The decision by the Amon Carter Museum has sparked a larger conversation about the role of museums in representing diverse identities and the balance between community sensitivities and artistic freedom. As museums continue to navigate issues of representation, it remains to be seen how institutions will handle works that challenge traditional notions of gender, sexuality, and race in the future.

For now, Esparza and Guerrero’s artwork, along with the rest of the Cowboy exhibition, continues to be on display at the museum, serving as a reminder of the complexities surrounding representation in contemporary art and culture.

Laverne Cox & George Wallace Bring Heart & Hilarity to Sitcom ‘Clean Slate’

This Prime Video sitcom delivers heartfelt humor and groundbreaking representation—here’s why you should watch.

A Fresh Take on Family and Identity

Executive produced by industry legends like Norman Lear, Laverne Cox, and George Wallace, the sitcom Clean Slate explores family, identity, and second chances in the most unexpected ways.

The series follows Harry Slate (Wallace), an old-school Alabama car wash owner whose world is turned upside down when his estranged child returns home—not as the son he remembers, but as Desiree (Cox), a proud trans woman. As the two attempt to mend their strained relationship, they navigate the growing pains of understanding each other, all while dealing with quirky neighbors, a church congregation in turmoil and an evolving romance between Desiree and Harry’s right-hand man, Mack (Jay Wilkison).

Cox and Wallace Reflect on Their Hollywood Journeys

Laverne Cox has been a trailblazer in Hollywood, breaking barriers as the first openly transgender person nominated for a Primetime Emmy Award. Her work in Orange Is the New Black put trans narratives in the mainstream, but Cox has continued pushing for authentic representation both in front of and behind the camera.

“This is one of the most difficult things I’ve done, ironically enough,” Cox said. “Partly because Desiree is so close to me. She’s based on me, and a lot of the storylines come from my life. I think she’s a younger version of me.”

“She made that happen,” Wallace said of Cox’s influence on the show’s inclusive atmosphere. “Every person from every walk of life was represented. I learned so much just by being with people I never hung out with before. We all became family.”

Meanwhile, Wallace, a veteran comedian and actor, brings decades of experience to the sitcom. Having worked alongside comedy greats like Richard Pryor and Redd Foxx, Wallace’s career spans stand-up, television and film.

Behind the Scenes: Creating an Inclusive Set

Beyond the laughs, the show boasts a truly diverse and inclusive production team.

“We created a writer’s room with people of color, queer people, trans people, people from the South, and people from the church,” Cox said. “Having representation at every level of production makes a difference. I’d be devastated if someone came from a project I worked on and said they had a horrible experience. The fact that people felt seen and celebrated? That’s what I’m proudest of.”

Wallace echoed Cox’s sentiments, emphasizing the importance of fostering a welcoming set.

What’s Next for Clean Slate?

While Season 1 is just beginning, the creators are already thinking ahead.

“We have about three or four seasons mapped out, and I’m super excited about what’s to come,” Cox teased. “If people love the show, they should write Amazon and say, ‘We need a second season!’”

Wallace added with a grin, “We’re going to do what the people want. And trust me, there’s a lot more coming.”

With its mix of heartfelt storytelling and laugh-out-loud moments, Clean Slate is poised to be a game-changer for sitcoms. If the first season is any indication, audiences are in for an emotional, hilarious and utterly unforgettable ride.

Catch Clean Slate streaming now on Prime Video!

J.K. Rowling Slams ‘Left’ Over Trump’s Executive Order on Women’s Sports

0

J.K. Rowling, the British author best known for creating the Harry Potter series, took to social media on Wednesday to voice her disapproval of those advocating for the inclusion of transgender women in women’s sports. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Rowling shared a photo of former U.S. President Donald Trump signing the “No Men in Women’s Sports” executive order, surrounded by applauding female athletes. The signing took place on National Girls and Women in Sports Day, a day dedicated to recognizing the achievements of women in sports and advocating for equal opportunities for female athletes.

In her post, Rowling directed a sharp message to “the left,” claiming that their efforts to allow transgender women—biological males who identify as female—to compete in women’s sports had contributed to a harmful shift in society. “Congratulations to every single person on the left who’s been campaigning to destroy women’s and girls’ rights,” Rowling wrote. “Without you, there’d be no images like this.”

The tweet was accompanied by a critical tone, as the author suggested that the push to allow transgender women in women’s sports had undermined women’s rights and safety. Rowling, who has been vocal about her views on the subject, continued her critique in another post, rejecting the argument that transgender inclusion affects only a small fraction of the population. “Why do you care about a tiny fraction of the population?” she remarked, dismissing the line as “utterly ridiculous.”

Rowling’s stance on the issue has been clear for years, as she has consistently supported the notion of keeping biological males out of women’s sports. The Harry Potter author argued that the promotion of gender ideology has led to a significant erosion of fundamental rights, including freedom of speech, scientific truth, and protections for women and children. “Gender ideology has undermined freedom of speech, scientific truth, gay rights, and women’s and girls’ safety, privacy and dignity,” she wrote. “It’s also caused irreparable physical damage to vulnerable kids. Nobody voted for it, the vast majority of people disagree with it, yet it has been imposed, top down, by politicians, healthcare bodies, academia, sections of the media, celebrities and even the police.”

The author’s post suggested that those advocating for gender inclusivity in sports and beyond had been misled or were ignoring the negative consequences of such policies. “This movement has impacted society in disastrous ways,” Rowling said. “If you had any sense, you’d be quietly deleting every trace of activist mantras, ad hominem attacks, false equivalence and circular arguments from your X feeds.”

In addition to her views on women’s sports, Rowling also made headlines last year when she criticized the BBC’s decision to award its Women’s Footballer of the Year award to Zambian soccer player Barbra Banda. Banda had previously withdrawn from the Zambian squad for the Women’s Africa Cup of Nations after failing to meet sex eligibility requirements. However, she was allowed to compete in the Paris Olympics and later became the second-leading scorer in the U.S. National Women’s Soccer League.

Rowling took to social media to express her outrage, stating, “Presumably the BBC decided this was more time efficient than going door to door to spit directly in women’s faces.”

Beyond her views on sports, Rowling has faced significant backlash for her outspoken criticism of transgender issues, particularly in relation to the Scottish Hate Crime Act. Signed into law last year, the legislation introduced a new crime of “stirring up hatred” against any of the protected groups covered by the bill, including transgender individuals. Rowling, a vocal critic of the law, has repeatedly expressed concern that it infringes on free speech and places limits on people’s ability to express their views on gender. She even challenged Scottish authorities to arrest her for calling “a man a man.”

In previous social media posts, Rowling also highlighted several instances in which male criminals claimed to be transgender in order to be housed in female prisons. She cited examples of male criminals convicted of serious offenses, including child sexual assault, who had been allowed to identify as women before serving their sentences. The author used these examples to argue that transgender inclusion policies posed a threat to women’s safety.

The issue of transgender inclusion in sports has been a contentious topic worldwide, with both sides of the debate fiercely defending their positions. Critics of transgender women competing in women’s sports argue that it creates an unfair advantage, given the physiological differences between men and women. Supporters of transgender rights, however, maintain that exclusion from sports is discriminatory and harmful to transgender individuals.

Rowling’s stance on this issue has earned her both support and condemnation. While she has found an audience of supporters who share her concerns about the impact of gender ideology on women’s rights, she has also faced significant backlash from the LGBTQ+ community and allies who accuse her of transphobia. Despite the controversy, Rowling remains an active and vocal participant in the debate, particularly on social media platforms like X, where she has continued to share her views on the subject.

As the debate over transgender rights in sports continues, Rowling’s comments are likely to fuel further conversations about the intersection of gender, equality, and fairness in athletics.

Google Scraps Diversity Hiring Targets and Reviews DEI Programs Amid Growing Backlash

0

Tech giant Google is ending its diversity hiring targets and reviewing its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, becoming the latest U.S. company to scale back or eliminate such programs.

The decision comes after years of public commitment to diversity initiatives following the murder of George Floyd in 2020, which sparked nationwide protests and calls for racial justice. At the time, Google announced it would set goals to increase “leadership representation of underrepresented groups,” particularly among Black and Latino communities. Approximately 96% of Google’s U.S.-based leaders were white or Asian, and about three-quarters of global leadership were men. The company aimed to change this by setting aspirational hiring targets to boost diversity within its workforce.

Between 2021 and 2024, the company provided regular updates on its progress, stating its commitment to integrating DEI principles into everything it does. Google made it clear in annual reports that it sought to create a workforce that better reflected the diversity of the users it served.

However, a noticeable shift occurred in Google’s latest report released on February 5. The line about integrating diversity, equity, and inclusion into the company’s ethos was absent, signaling a significant change in direction.

In a company-wide email, Google’s Chief People Officer Fiona Cicconi confirmed that the company would no longer set specific hiring targets for improving workforce diversity. “In 2020, we set aspirational hiring goals and focused on growing our offices outside California and New York to improve representation,” Cicconi wrote. “We’ll continue to invest in states across the U.S. and in many countries globally, but in the future, we will no longer have aspirational goals.”

This move marks a shift in Google’s stance, and the company has indicated that it will now review DEI programs, policies, and grants that may pose risks or fail to deliver the intended results. The company’s decision follows similar actions by other major corporations, such as Amazon and Meta, which recently scaled back or eliminated their DEI initiatives due to changes in the legal and political landscape.

Google’s decision has been widely interpreted as a response to right-wing pressure, particularly from those who have criticized corporate DEI efforts. The company is reportedly considering recent executive orders from former President Donald Trump, which targeted DEI initiatives within the federal government.

Despite eliminating hiring targets, Google has pledged to continue supporting resource groups for minorities within the company. These employee-led groups are designed to provide support and advocacy for various communities and currently include 17 different groups with more than 50,000 members.

“We’re committed to creating a workplace where all our employees can succeed and have equal opportunities, and over the past year we’ve been reviewing our programs designed to help us get there,” a Google spokesperson said in a statement. “Our teams are also evaluating changes required following recent court decisions and executive orders on this topic.”

Parul Koul, president of the Alphabet Workers Union (AWU), strongly criticized the changes, calling them “a real attack on gains that workers have made in the tech industry through movements fighting against racism, gender and LGBTQ discrimination, going all the way back to the civil rights movement.” Koul further described the move as part of a troubling trend in tech companies, where there is a growing anti-worker, right-wing influence.

“We are committed to fighting against this trend,” Koul added.

Google’s decision to scale back its DEI initiatives is part of a broader shift in corporate America. Amazon and Meta also made similar moves in January, eliminating their DEI policies. Meta attributed its decision to changes in the “legal and policy landscape” and announced that it would stop moderating comments on topics such as immigration and gender, while ending independent fact-checking in favor of a community notes system. Amazon, on the other hand, said it was “winding down outdated programs and materials,” emphasizing a new focus on programs with proven outcomes.

Several other major companies, including Ford, Lowe’s, Walmart, Harley-Davidson, and Jack Daniel’s, have distanced themselves from DEI initiatives in response to pressure from conservative campaigners, including pundit Robby Starbuck.

As more companies reconsider or abandon their diversity programs, the future of DEI initiatives in corporate America remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about their effectiveness and the political ramifications surrounding them. The move by Google, one of the largest tech companies in the world, signals a growing divide in how corporations approach issues of diversity, inclusion, and equality.

Elton John and Brandi Carlile Announce Collaborative Album ‘Who Believes In Angels?’

0

Elton John and Brandi Carlile have teamed up for a highly anticipated album, Who Believes In Angels?, set to be released on April 4. The Oscar-nominated duo, who previously earned a nod for their collaboration on the track “Never Too Late” from the documentary Elton John: Never Too Late, have crafted a 10-track album together, blending their iconic musical talents.

The first single, the title track Who Believes In Angels?, was released on February 5, 2025, giving fans an early taste of the upcoming project. Along with the album, the pair will perform a special one-off concert titled An Evening With Elton John & Brandi Carlile, which will take place on March 26 at The London Palladium. Described as a “one-night-only event,” the concert will feature both performance and storytelling, offering fans an intimate experience with the artists.

Tickets for the event will be available exclusively to fans who pre-order the album, giving them the chance to attend what promises to be a memorable occasion.

The album is the result of a unique collaboration not only between John and Carlile but also with producer Andrew Wyatt and John’s long-time lyricist Bernie Taupin. The creative team behind the album shares a nomination for Best Original Song at the Oscars for their work on John’s documentary. The nominated track will also appear on the upcoming album.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Elton John (@eltonjohn)

John expressed excitement about the album’s creation, telling Variety, “Between the four of us, what went down in the studio is pretty magical. And you know, I don’t wanna let cats out of the bag, but you ain’t heard nothing yet. There’s something coming your way which is gonna blow your a** off.”

The album was recorded in just 20 days in October 2023 at L.A.’s Sunset Sound Studio. In addition to John and Carlile, the album features contributions from some well-known musicians, including Red Hot Chili Peppers drummer Chad Smith, bassist Pino Palladino, and guitarist Josh Klinghoffer, who has also toured with Pearl Jam.

In addition to the album, fans can look forward to a short film offering a behind-the-scenes look at the making of Who Believes In Angels?. The film, captured through static cameras placed around the studio, documents the entire creative process — including moments of creative struggle, breakthroughs, and emotional highs and lows. The raw footage offers fans an unprecedented, candid view into the challenging yet rewarding journey of creating the album.

Ahead of the release, Carlile, a 11-time Grammy Award winner, shared her excitement about the collaboration. Reflecting on her long admiration for John, Carlile wrote, “I’ve been singing together with him for basically my whole life – he just didn’t know it.” She continued, “I’ve been working — and dreaming — my way towards this moment since I was 11 years old. Every album I’ve ever made has carried Elton’s name in the liner notes, my quiet thank you to the artist without whom I would have never written a song. It was impossible to imagine that one day, he’d not only be my hero, but probably my best friend. In some way though, I think maybe I knew?”

Who Believes In Angels? promises to showcase a deep, emotional connection between the two artists, built on years of mutual respect and admiration. Carlile has frequently cited John as a major influence in her own music career, and this collaboration marks a culmination of their shared musical history.

The album’s release on April 4 will be followed by the highly anticipated concert, An Evening With Elton John & Brandi Carlile, which will take place at The London Palladium on March 26. This special evening will offer fans a rare opportunity to see the two artists perform together in an intimate setting, blending their musical talents with personal stories from their respective careers.

Who Believes In Angels? will undoubtedly be a standout release for both artists, combining the timeless sound of Elton John with Brandi Carlile’s powerful vocals and emotional songwriting. Fans can expect an album filled with heartfelt tracks and a glimpse into the powerful creative process that shaped this collaboration.

Mark your calendars for April 4, when Who Believes In Angels? will be available for purchase, and make sure to pre-order for a chance to attend the exclusive concert event next month.

Rep. Nancy Mace Repeatedly Spews Anti-Trans Slur During House Hearing: ‘I Don’t Really Care’

0

Rep. Gerry Connolly has requested a formal inquiry into Rep. Nancy Mace’s use of a derogatory slur toward the transgender community during a House Oversight and Government Reform hearing on February 5. The Republican congresswoman’s remarks were made amid her ongoing controversial statements and attacks on the transgender community, as well as on fellow congresswoman Sarah McBride.

During the hearing, Mace asked a panel of experts whether it was in the best interest of American citizens to fund a $2 million program in Guatemala, which she described as funding “t****ies” in reference to gender-affirming surgeries. Her comments sparked immediate backlash from several members of the House, including Connolly, who expressed concern over Mace’s use of a term widely recognized as a slur within the LGBTQ+ and transgender communities.

“Does this advance the interest of American citizens — paying for t****ies in Guatemala to the tune of $2 million?” Mace asked the panel. She went on to criticize U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) programs, questioning whether such expenditures were beneficial to the American public.

Following Mace’s questioning, Connolly, a Democrat from Virginia, raised the issue of decorum, particularly the use of the derogatory term. “The gentlelady has used a phrase that is considered a slur in the LGBTQ community and the trans community,” Connolly said, addressing the committee chair, Rep. James Comer.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by COURIER (@couriernewsroom)

Connolly sought to continue his point, but Mace interrupted him, which led to her repeating the slur three times. “I don’t really care,” Mace responded defiantly. “You want penises in women’s bathrooms and I’m not gonna have it. No, thank you. It’s disgusting.”

Connolly, visibly frustrated, continued: “To me, a slur is a slur. And here in the committee, a level of decorum requires us to try consciously to avoid slurs.” He emphasized that such language was unnecessary in a policy debate, saying, “We can debate policy discussion without offending human beings who are fellow citizens.”

Connolly then formally requested a parliamentary inquiry into whether Mace’s remarks violated the committee’s standards for decorum. “I would ask as a parliamentary inquiry whether the use of that phrase is not, in fact, a violation of the decorum rules,” he said, underscoring the importance of respectful dialogue in government proceedings.

Mace, however, rejected Connolly’s request, stating, “I’m not going to be counselled by a man over men and women’s spaces or men who have mental health issues dressing as women.”

Chairman Comer, who was overseeing the hearing, responded that he was not sufficiently informed about LGBTQ+ terminology or the specifics of anti-trans slurs and would “look into” the matter further. He did not make any immediate judgment about the appropriateness of Mace’s language.

The exchange quickly drew attention and condemnation from advocacy groups and LGBTQ+ rights organizations. Critics argue that Mace’s repeated use of the slur contributes to the harmful rhetoric surrounding transgender people, a community that already faces significant discrimination and marginalization.

Mace’s comments are part of a broader, ongoing culture war in the U.S. involving transgender rights. The congresswoman has previously drawn criticism for her remarks on trans issues, particularly her opposition to the inclusion of transgender women in women’s sports and her confrontations with trans advocates like McBride.

As a result of the hearing and the request for inquiry, calls for accountability have intensified. Advocates stress the importance of lawmakers using inclusive language when discussing vulnerable communities, particularly in official legislative settings. Connolly’s actions were widely praised by LGBTQ+ groups who argue that members of Congress should maintain a standard of respect and dignity when addressing all citizens, including transgender individuals.

The episode is a continuation of a broader national debate on the rights of transgender individuals, particularly in the realms of sports, healthcare, and social acceptance. While Mace’s remarks and the subsequent inquiry have ignited a political firestorm, they also underscore the ongoing cultural and political battles over transgender rights in the United States.

As of now, it remains unclear what actions will be taken in response to the parliamentary inquiry. However, the incident has sparked renewed conversations about the language used by elected officials when addressing sensitive issues surrounding the LGBTQ+ community. The outcome of this inquiry could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future.

Troye Sivan Revealed He Has New Music Indeed Coming

0

Troye Sivan is ready to heat things up again. The “Bloom” singer recently revealed new details about his fourth studio album, hinting it will be as bold and sex-positive as ever.

In 2023, Sivan dropped his third LP, “Something to Give Each Other,” which he described as a celebration of “sex, dance, sweat, community, queerness, love, and friendship.” The record boasted 10 pop gems—including fan-favorite singles “Rush,” “One of Your Girls” and “Got Me Started”—and received widespread acclaim for its unapologetically queer lyrics, slick production and Sivan’s signature vocals.

Troye Sivan Confirms New Music is Indeed Coming

Critics weren’t the only ones who noticed. “Something to Give Each Other” snagged three Grammy nominations and took home two ARIA Music Awards, for Album of the Year and Best Pop Release. Still, while listeners continue to binge the album’s irresistible hooks, Sivan has his sights set firmly on what’s next.

Related | Troye Sivan and Ross Lynch are Flirting on TikTok

During the 67th Grammy Awards, the “Blue Neighbourhood” artist—accompanied by longtime friend and collaborator Leland—told PRIDE he’s already in the studio cooking up new music. And if you thought “Something to Give Each Other” was sultry, brace yourselves for round two.

“I am really inspired by sex,” Sivan told the outlet. “We’re going into the studio tomorrow, literally!”

Beyond teasing more sexy sounds, the Australian pop star also underscored the significance of LGBTQIA+ representation at major events like the Grammys.

“[There’s an] unbelievable showing of resilience and strength. I think we have to look out for each other and have each other’s backs at the moment,” he said, adding, “I feel so proud to be a gay man [and] to be a queer man today more than ever.”

If you need even more proof Sivan isn’t holding back on the steamy details, look no further than his recent appearance in Grindr’s “Tap or Block?” video. Joined by several of his tour dancers, the 28-year-old singer gamely dished on topics like “hotel sex”—receiving a unanimous thumbs-up from the squad.

Related | Shawn Mendes Liked Troye Sivan’s Butt Pic on Instagram

“I mean, if we didn’t [have hotel sex], then we would be celibate for seven months, which would be crazy,” Sivan joked.

When asked about a partner being “super hairy,” Sivan shrugged off any hesitations.

“It’s kinda hot,” he said, though one dancer, Mauro, disagreed. “For me, the ick is [when] you can tell they’ve shaved, and it’s growing back everywhere,” Sivan explained. “I’m like, girl, it’s fine. Know what I mean?”

The group also tackled other provocative prompts—like taking a nude next to an everyday object (for, ahem, size comparison), skipping a post-gym shower (for the musk, of course), satin sheets and open relationships—keeping the banter playful and revealing.

For a taste of Sivan’s candid sense of humor (and plenty of laughs), check out the full “Tap or Block?” clip below. As for his forthcoming album, fans will have to stay tuned. But if his latest confessions are any indication, Troye Sivan’s next era is set to be an even more electrifying mix of sultry pop anthems, unabashed queer visibility and fearless self-expression.

More Stories

Trump Signs Executive Order Blocking Federal Funds for Schools Allowing Transgender Women in Sports

0

Former President Donald Trump has signed an executive order aimed at restricting transgender women and girls from participating in sports designated for cisgender females. The order blocks federal funding for schools that allow transgender athletes to compete on women’s sports teams and mandates that the Department of Justice take legal action against institutions permitting such participation.

The executive order also outlines a plan to convene representatives from major athletic organizations and governing bodies to create guidelines that would prevent transgender women from competing in women’s sports. Additionally, the order threatens to bar cisgender American athletes from international sports competitions if those events permit transgender athletes to compete alongside cisgender athletes.

The move continues Trump’s track record of opposing transgender rights, especially in the realm of education and athletics. The order argues that transgender women competing in women’s sports is “demeaning, unfair, and dangerous,” and claims it deprives cisgender women of fair opportunities to compete. It also states that transgender female participation in female sports is a violation of women’s dignity, safety, and privacy.

The order underscores that “the President’s interpretation of the law governs,” citing the desire to protect the integrity of women’s sports. The policy argues that the inclusion of trans women in female athletic spaces results in the “endangerment, humiliation, and silencing” of cisgender women and girls. It continues, “It shall also be the policy of the United States to oppose male competitive participation in women’s sports more broadly, as a matter of safety, fairness, dignity, and truth.”

This directive marks the latest development in the ongoing debate over transgender rights in sports, which has divided lawmakers and advocacy groups. Trump’s executive order takes direct aim at policies implemented during the administration of President Joe Biden, which took a more inclusive stance on transgender rights. Under Biden, Title IX, the landmark civil rights law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in education, was interpreted to protect transgender students from discrimination.

In contrast, Trump’s order attempts to reinterpret Title IX in a manner that would deny the existence of transgender people in female athletics. Trump’s position directly opposes the previous administration’s understanding of the law, effectively reversing protections that had been extended to transgender individuals.

Despite the Biden administration’s inclusive stance, there have been no federal guidelines issued to regulate transgender participation in sports at the K-12 or collegiate levels. In April 2023, the Biden administration proposed a rule allowing schools to limit the participation of transgender athletes, while ensuring that outright bans would be prohibited. However, this proposal was rescinded in December 2024, with the administration stating that the issue was legally complex and too contentious to pursue further.

Trump’s new order directs the U.S. Department of Education and the Department of Justice to take punitive actions against schools that violate the directive, including the possibility of lawsuits or the withholding of federal funds. The order also targets educational institutions that permit transgender athletes to compete in women’s sports, and further mandates that any such policies be revoked.

Furthermore, the order calls for a meeting of major athletic organizations within 60 days, urging them to adopt anti-transgender policies, particularly regarding transgender women’s participation in female sports categories. The order also requests that state attorneys general develop best practices for ensuring “equal opportunities” for women in sports, with a focus on the alleged harm caused by the inclusion of transgender athletes.

Trump’s directive also addresses international athletics, asking the U.S. government to encourage other nations to adopt anti-transgender policies and pressuring the International Olympic Committee to ban transgender athletes from competing in future Olympic Games.

In comments made prior to signing the order, Trump claimed that the executive action would prevent “men” from “beating up, injuring, and cheating our women and our girls.” He cited unverified claims that transgender athletes had accumulated over 3,500 victories in women’s competitions, though he provided no evidence to support this assertion. He also mentioned a purported incident where a “male boxer” allegedly “stole” a women’s gold medal during the Paris Olympics, a claim that has been debunked as a misunderstanding of a cisgender athlete’s participation.

Trump’s order has been met with strong opposition from LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations, with Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson criticizing the move. Robinson said that the order risks exposing young transgender athletes to harassment and discrimination. She added that the order would create divisive and harmful policies at a time when the country is facing pressing issues in education and society.

In a separate statement, GLAAD denounced the order as “inaccurate” and “incoherent,” emphasizing that all women and girls, including transgender women, should have the right to participate in sports. GLAAD further noted that the order does not change the law or the facts, reinforcing the belief that transgender athletes should be free from legal and political attacks.

As of now, 27 states have enacted laws banning transgender athletes from participating in girls’ and women’s sports. These policies affect not only K-12 students but also extend to collegiate teams and co-ed recreational leagues. The restrictions have led to instances of “trans-vestigation,” where cisgender athletes are questioned or scrutinized due to their perceived gender identity, further fueling the debate over fairness and inclusion in sports.

Trump’s executive order represents a major escalation in the ongoing battle over transgender rights in the U.S. The decision is expected to further polarize the debate, as both sides continue to advocate for their positions on how to define fairness and inclusion in competitive athletics.

Orville Peck Unveils Mask and Goes Shirtless in First Cabaret Rehearsal Photos

0

Orville Peck, the enigmatic country singer known for his signature mask, is gearing up for his Broadway debut in Cabaret at the August Wilson Theater this spring. The artist, who has captivated audiences with his distinct voice and unique persona, will take on the iconic role of Emcee for a 16-week run, starting this spring.

On Tuesday, Peck shared a glimpse into his rehearsal process, offering fans a sneak peek at his preparations for the highly anticipated Broadway role. His Instagram post included a mix of images: a selfie of the singer, a photo of his rehearsal binder for Cabaret, a screenshot of an audio file, an adorable shot with his dog, and what seemed like a maskless photo taken while sitting in a makeup chair. Alongside the images, Peck teased his followers with a cryptic caption: “Lots happening [upside-down emoji].”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Orville Peck (@orvillepeck)

Fans are eagerly speculating whether new music is on the horizon for Peck or if the singer is hinting at an unmasked appearance in Cabaret. Of course, there’s also the burning question: can we meet Peck’s dog? While Peck didn’t provide answers to these questions, his post has certainly piqued interest as the theater world anticipates his Broadway debut.

Peck’s casting in Cabaret was officially announced in mid-January, and the news sent waves through both the Broadway and LGBTQ+ communities. The role of Emcee, a charismatic and often provocative character at the center of the musical, is one that has been a dream role for Peck since his teenage years. In an interview with Deadline, he shared his excitement: “The Emcee has been my dream role since I was a teenager. The nature of the character allows for complete freedom of individual expression. It can be portrayed through such a vast range of emotions, perspectives, and performance styles. That kind of freedom is every actor’s dream.”

Peck, who rose to fame as a country music artist in 2019, has roots in theater. Before his music career took off, he trained as an actor at the prestigious London Academy of Music and Dramatic Art (LAMDA). He also had a brief stint on the West End, appearing in Peter Pan Goes Wrong, showcasing his versatility as a performer.

“I truly cannot believe I’m getting to make my Broadway debut in one of my favorite shows, and in probably my favorite role in all of musical theater,” Peck shared with Deadline. He reflected on his career journey, adding, “I grew up in the theater. I was a working actor and a dancer for many years before I started making music. I did the hustle, and the struggle, for a long time, trying to make things happen for myself. But it taught me so much of who I am as a performer and a person, so it feels very full circle to be making a return to it at this point in my career.”

The excitement surrounding Peck’s Broadway debut is palpable, with fans eagerly awaiting his portrayal of the Emcee. The role is known for its complexity, charm, and daring nature, and it is often seen as a perfect fit for an artist like Peck, who blends raw emotion and creative expression in his music. For Peck, Cabaret is not only a professional milestone but also a deeply personal one, allowing him to return to the world of theater that shaped his early years.

As rehearsals continue, questions about what fans can expect from Peck’s take on the role are growing. Will he keep his iconic mask on during performances, or will he reveal his face? Will there be surprises in store, such as new music or special performances? Only time will tell. What is clear is that Orville Peck’s Broadway debut is one of the most anticipated events of the season, and fans are eager to see how his distinctive talents translate onto the stage.

Peck’s appearance in Cabaret is more than just a performance—it’s a culmination of years of hard work, passion, and perseverance in both the theater and music worlds. His journey to Broadway is a testament to the diverse paths artists take to reach their dreams, and his upcoming run as the Emcee promises to be an unforgettable chapter in his career. As the date draws closer, one thing is for certain: Orville Peck’s Broadway debut will be one for the history books.

Fans can stay updated on his Broadway journey and more by following Peck on social media, where he continues to share glimpses of his preparations and the exciting steps leading up to his debut.