Home Blog Page 66

Russian LGBT Travel Agent’s Case to Proceed to Trial Despite His Death While in Custody

0

The case of Andrey Kotov, a Russian travel agent who was found dead in custody in December, is set to proceed to trial. Kotov, who was arrested in late November 2023 for allegedly organizing tours for queer people, was charged with participating in and organizing the activities of an “extremist community” under a law that outlawed the so-called “international LGBT movement” in Russia. BBC News Russian reported on the ongoing case Friday.

Kotov’s arrest came after Russian authorities intensified their crackdown on LGBTQ+ activities following a Supreme Court ruling in 2023 that banned the “international LGBT movement.” The law targets any organizations or individuals suspected of promoting what the state deems to be “extremist” ideologies related to LGBTQ+ rights.

Kotov, a 40-year-old travel agent, was detained in late November and accused of organizing boat trips on the Volga River and a tour to Egypt for queer Russians. These tours were reportedly seen by authorities as a threat to Russia’s constitutional order and national security. Despite the charges, Kotov’s defense team, led by lawyer Leysan Mannapova, has firmly denied the accusations, arguing that Kotov’s activities did not fall within the scope of extremism.

Violent Arrest and Death in Custody

According to reports, Kotov was subjected to harsh treatment by police during his arrest. Footage of a police raid on Kotov’s home in November showed him struggling to breathe as officers aggressively interrogated him. In a court hearing on December 2, Kotov described his arrest, saying, “About 15 people showed up in the middle of the night. I was beaten, punched in the face, hit on the legs.” These remarks were reported by the Russian news outlet Mediazona, which has closely followed the case.

The brutality during his detention has raised concerns among human rights organizations. Kotov’s lawyer, Leysan Mannapova, emphasized that Kotov was deeply traumatized by the arrest and the treatment he endured in custody. Despite this, Kotov maintained his innocence, denying the charges against him during the court proceedings.

Kotov was found dead in his prison cell within a month of his arrest, with investigators quickly declaring his death a suicide. This claim has sparked skepticism among Kotov’s family and supporters, who argue that his death may have been the result of police mistreatment or abuse while in custody.

However, investigators insisted that Kotov’s death was a suicide, and the case was initially set to be closed. Nevertheless, Kotov’s lawyer, Mannapova, told BBC News Russian in December that the investigation would proceed after Kotov’s relatives requested that the case not be closed. This decision has raised hopes among those who seek justice for Kotov, despite the official claims of suicide.

Shocking Charges and Confusion

The charges brought against Kotov were a shock to many, including his defense team. In a statement to BBC News Russian in January, Mannapova explained that Kotov had been blindsided by the accusations and had difficulty understanding what he was being charged with. “He never fully understood what he was being accused of,” she said. “It was a complete shock for him.”

Kotov’s close friend, Svetlana, revealed that Kotov had always considered himself an apolitical person who did not think Russia’s increasingly repressive anti-LGBT laws would directly affect him. “We’ve always been oppressed and persecuted. We’ll survive. It’s no big deal,” Svetlana recalled Kotov saying. His remarks reflect the sense of resilience that many members of the LGBTQ+ community in Russia feel in the face of escalating discrimination.

However, it appears Kotov underestimated the scope of the government’s crackdown. Authorities charged him for allegedly organizing events that catered to LGBTQ+ Russians, despite his apparent lack of awareness that such activities could fall under the scope of the newly implemented anti-extremism laws. The investigation claimed that Kotov’s boat trips on the Volga and his tour to Egypt for queer Russians were acts of organizing a “community” that was seen as threatening to the Russian state’s values.

Impact on Russia’s LGBTQ+ Community

Kotov’s death and the charges against him come at a time of heightened tension for the LGBTQ+ community in Russia. Over the past few years, the Russian government has passed increasingly restrictive laws that target LGBTQ+ rights and activism. The country’s 2013 “gay propaganda” law, which bans the promotion of LGBTQ+ rights to minors, has been followed by further legislation aimed at curbing LGBTQ+ visibility and organizing.

LGBTQ+ rights activists and international human rights groups have condemned these measures, calling them a violation of fundamental human rights. The death of Andrey Kotov in custody has raised alarm bells about the risks faced by those in Russia who continue to support or organize events for the LGBTQ+ community, despite the dangers.

The Russian government’s crackdown on LGBTQ+ individuals and organizations has created an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty. Many queer Russians now live in constant worry of being targeted by authorities for simply existing or engaging in activities that were once legal. Kotov’s case highlights the personal toll of these policies, as well as the growing risk to individuals who, like him, are involved in organizing spaces or events for queer people.

As the case against Kotov proceeds to trial, his supporters and human rights groups will continue to monitor the situation. They are calling for a full investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death in custody and are demanding accountability from the authorities. The outcome of this case may have significant implications not only for the future of Russia’s LGBTQ+ community but also for the broader fight for human rights in the country.

The Russian government has yet to respond to the growing international outcry over Kotov’s death, but the case is likely to draw continued attention as it unfolds. Human rights organizations are urging both Russian authorities and the international community to take a stand against the growing persecution of LGBTQ+ individuals in Russia and to ensure that justice is served for Kotov’s death.

Neil Patrick Harris Joins Cast of Dexter: Resurrection in Guest Starring Role

0

Emmy and Tony Award winner Neil Patrick Harris has been cast in the highly anticipated Showtime series Dexter: Resurrection, which will serve as a follow-up to the 2021 series Dexter: New Blood. Harris will guest star as the character “Lowell,” adding to an already star-studded ensemble.

Production for Dexter: Resurrection began in January in New York City, with the series slated to premiere this summer on Paramount+ with Showtime. The follow-up to Dexter: New Blood marks another chapter in the iconic Dexter franchise, which has captivated audiences with its thrilling portrayal of Dexter Morgan, a serial killer who targets other killers.

A Star-Studded Cast

Clyde Phillips, who is returning as the showrunner and executive producer, has been assembling a dynamic cast for the series, which will see Michael C. Hall reprise his role as the titular Dexter Morgan. Harris joins a group of familiar faces and new characters who will shape the storyline.

Returning cast members include David Zayas, who will once again portray Detective Angel Batista; Jack Alcott as Dexter’s son, Harrison Morgan; and James Remar as Dexter’s father, Harry Morgan. Alongside Harris, several new faces have been added to the cast, including Uma Thurman as Charley, Peter Dinklage as Leon Prater, Krysten Ritter as Mia Lapierre, and Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine as Blessing Kamara. Additional new additions include Kadia Saraf as Detective Claudette Wallace, Dominic Fumusa as Detective Melvin Oliva, and Emilia Suárez as Elsa Rivera.

With such a diverse and talented group of actors, Dexter: Resurrection is shaping up to be a thrilling continuation of the beloved series.

A New Chapter in the Dexter Universe

Dexter: Resurrection will follow the events of Dexter: New Blood, which garnered significant attention for bringing the series back after its controversial finale in 2013. In Dexter: New Blood, Dexter Morgan was living under a new identity in a small town in upstate New York. The series explored the consequences of Dexter’s past actions while also delving into his relationship with his son, Harrison, who had grown up without him.

The new series will pick up where Dexter: New Blood left off, but little is known about the exact direction the story will take. However, the addition of notable new characters and the return of familiar faces has fans eagerly anticipating what’s next for the serial killer and his complicated web of relationships.

A Strong Track Record for Dexter

The Dexter franchise has maintained a loyal fanbase for over a decade. The original Dexter series, which ran from 2006 to 2013, followed Dexter Morgan as he balanced his life as a blood-spatter analyst for Miami Metro Police and his dark, vigilante side. The show was praised for its complex characters, morally gray storytelling, and its unique exploration of the antihero archetype.

After the original series concluded, Dexter: New Blood reinvigorated the franchise by providing closure to Dexter’s story and introducing new characters. The series became a massive hit, quickly becoming one of the most streamed original series for Showtime in recent years. The season finale in February drew 2.68 million global viewers, making it the most-watched episode of the season. The success of Dexter: New Blood laid the groundwork for Dexter: Resurrection, which is expected to further explore the character’s complex journey.

In addition to Dexter: Resurrection, the franchise also recently launched Dexter: Original Sin, a prequel series that focuses on a young Dexter Morgan. The first season of Dexter: Original Sin, which premiered in December, follows a younger Dexter as he begins his journey into becoming a serial killer. This series was praised for its fresh take on the Dexter mythos and quickly became the most streamed global original series for Showtime in the past decade.

Behind the Scenes

Dexter: Resurrection is executive produced by Clyde Phillips, who is best known for his work on the original Dexter series, as well as his role as showrunner for Nurse Jackie. Phillips will also return as the showrunner for Dexter: Resurrection, continuing his involvement in the franchise that helped establish its unique voice and tone. Michael C. Hall, who stars as Dexter Morgan, will also serve as an executive producer on the series alongside Phillips. Other executive producers include Scott Reynolds, Tony Hernandez, and Lilly Burns.

Marcos Siega, who directed episodes of Dexter: New Blood, will serve as the producing director for the new series. Monica Raymund, who appeared in Dexter: Original Sin, is set to direct four episodes, while Siega will direct six episodes.

The series is produced by Showtime Studios and Counterpart Studios, with distribution handled by Paramount Global Content Distribution.

As Dexter: Resurrection prepares for its summer premiere, fans are eager to see how the series will evolve, especially with the addition of Neil Patrick Harris and other notable stars. The return of Michael C. Hall as Dexter Morgan, along with the new characters introduced in the show, promises an exciting continuation of the Dexter legacy.

With its gripping storytelling, compelling characters, and a mix of familiar faces and new talent, Dexter: Resurrection is set to be a major hit for Showtime and Paramount+. Fans of the long-running series can expect plenty of twists, drama, and dark thrills as Dexter Morgan’s journey continues.

Gavin Newsom Sparks Outrage with Controversial Comments on Transgender Athletes, Breaks from Democratic Stance

0

California Gov. Gavin Newsom stirred controversy on Thursday by expressing his belief that it is “deeply unfair” for transgender women and girls to compete in female sports, marking a sharp departure from the stance held by most of his fellow Democrats. His comments, made during a 71-minute interview on his new podcast, This Is Gavin Newsom, drew both criticism and support as he addressed the contentious issue of trans inclusion in athletics.

Newsom’s remarks, made in a conversation with conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, focused on the fairness of allowing transgender athletes to compete on teams that align with their gender identities. Newsom’s stance is in contrast to longstanding Democratic support for trans inclusion in school sports.

Kirk, the co-founder of Turning Point USA, challenged Newsom during the interview by asking whether he would denounce the participation of a transgender high school athlete in California, who recently won the triple jump at a track meet. “Would you say no to men in female sports?” Kirk asked.

Newsom replied, “I think it’s an issue of fairness, I completely agree with you on that. It’s deeply unfair.”

The governor, a Democrat who has long been associated with progressive policies on LGBTQ+ rights, clarified that while he agreed with Kirk on the fairness issue, he also sympathized with the struggles of transgender individuals. “These poor people are more likely to commit suicide, have anxiety and depression,” Newsom said. “The way people talk down to vulnerable communities is an issue that I have a hard time with as well.”

He added that transgender inclusion in sports should be approached with “humility and grace,” acknowledging the difficulty of balancing fairness concerns with the well-being of transgender individuals.

Newsom’s comments come at a time when the debate over transgender athletes has gained national attention. Just days before Newsom’s podcast appearance, Democrats in the U.S. Senate voted unanimously to block a bill that would have banned transgender girls and women from competing in women’s sports in any federally funded athletic program, including public schools.

Though Newsom did not specify whether he believes trans inclusion in sports is unfair at all levels of competition, his remarks suggested that he sees the issue as particularly problematic at certain competitive levels. He did not respond to a request for further clarification.

The conversation continued as Kirk made inflammatory remarks about the state of trans issues in America, calling the “trans stuff” “an affront to all of our senses” and decrying what he described as “chemical castration” of minors. He claimed that Americans were increasingly opposed to what he characterized as the overreach of LGBTQ+ rights in youth sports and medical care.

Newsom responded, “I think we have to be more sensitized to that,” but did not engage deeply with Kirk’s inflammatory rhetoric.

The conversation also touched on polls that reveal a divided public opinion on policies related to transition-related care for minors. One 2022 poll by Pew Research Center showed that 46% of Americans supported laws restricting gender-transition care for minors, while 31% opposed such laws. Other polling has found significant opposition to medical interventions for younger transgender individuals, such as puberty blockers or hormone treatments.

Newsom, while not delving into the specifics of these policies, acknowledged the heated nature of the debate. He also commented on the challenges faced by LGBTQ+ individuals, noting that more must be done to support these communities.

Kirk also referenced the Cass report, an independent study commissioned by England’s National Health Service, which concluded that the medical evidence for transition-related care for minors was weak. Newsom acknowledged that he was not an expert on the issue but emphasized the need for careful and thoughtful discussions on the matter.

Newsom’s comments have sparked backlash from LGBTQ+ advocates, particularly those in his own party. California Assemblymember Chris Ward and State Senator Caroline Menjivar, both members of the California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus, expressed their frustration with the governor’s remarks. They issued a statement saying they were “profoundly sickened and frustrated” by Newsom’s position, arguing that the governor’s views could undermine protections for transgender students in California.

Ward and Menjivar referenced California’s 2013 law, which allows transgender students to participate in school sports based on their gender identity. The law has been a landmark policy aimed at ensuring inclusion for transgender students, and many LGBTQ+ advocates argue that Newsom’s recent comments could signal a shift away from such protections.

Despite the criticism, Newsom has a long history of supporting LGBTQ+ rights. As mayor of San Francisco in 2004, he famously defied state law by issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. In recent years, he has signed laws protecting transgender minors and ensuring access to gender-affirming care in California.

During the podcast, Newsom also discussed a California law he signed that prohibits schools from disclosing a student’s gender identity or sexual orientation to parents without the student’s consent. This law, which aims to protect LGBTQ+ students’ privacy, has drawn criticism from conservative groups like Kirk, who argued it restricts parental rights.

Newsom’s interview has left many wondering whether his stance on transgender athletes represents a shift in his political approach, as he navigates the complex intersection of LGBTQ+ rights and public opinion. As the debate over transgender inclusion in sports continues to unfold, Newsom’s comments have added fuel to the fire, particularly in California, a state known for its progressive policies on LGBTQ+ issues.

As the issue continues to be debated, Newsom’s position remains a point of contention within both his party and the broader political landscape.

Two Pennsylvania School Districts and Parents Sue Over Expanded Anti-Discrimination Protections for LGBTQ+ Individuals

0

Two public school districts and several parents are challenging Pennsylvania’s expanded anti-discrimination regulations, which offer protections for LGBTQ+ individuals, in a lawsuit filed Thursday. The plaintiffs argue that the two-year-old regulation oversteps the intent of lawmakers and is therefore illegal.

The lawsuit, submitted to Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Court, is part of a broader, national conversation about the rights of transgender individuals, especially in relation to high school sports and transgender athletes competing in women’s competitions. The plaintiffs seek to overturn a state regulation that has broadened the scope of sex discrimination to include sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression, which they argue was never authorized by the state legislature.

If successful, the lawsuit would strip the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (PHRC) of its ability to investigate discrimination claims related to sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. Additionally, the plaintiffs hope the ruling would restrict transgender students from competing in women’s high school sports within the state.

School Districts and State Lawmakers Among Plaintiffs

The lawsuit was filed by two school districts from western Pennsylvania — South Side Area School District and Knoch School District — along with two Republican state lawmakers, Reps. Aaron Bernstine and Barbara Gleim. Three parents and seven students are also named as plaintiffs in the case.

The defendants include Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, an agency responsible for investigating discrimination in housing, employment, and public accommodations based on race, sex, religion, age, and disability.

On Friday, Shapiro’s office declined to comment on the lawsuit, and the PHRC did not immediately respond to requests for a statement.

Legal Basis of the Lawsuit

The central issue in the lawsuit revolves around the expanded definition of sex discrimination in Pennsylvania’s anti-discrimination law, which was implemented by the Human Relations Commission in 2023. The plaintiffs contend that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has historically interpreted “sex” as either male or female, and they assert that the legislature did not authorize the commission to expand this definition through regulation.

The plaintiffs argue that this regulatory change encroaches on the legislature’s constitutional authority to make laws. They assert that the state constitution requires lawmakers, rather than state agencies, to decide on such fundamental definitions of discrimination.

In contrast, the PHRC justifies its expanded interpretation by citing the Pennsylvania courts’ practice of aligning state anti-discrimination laws with federal guidelines. The commission has authority to handle discrimination complaints and can negotiate settlements, impose civil penalties, or award damages, including back pay.

Background on Pennsylvania’s LGBTQ+ Anti-Discrimination Efforts

The regulation in question was passed in late 2022 and took effect in early 2023. This change came after years of debate in the state legislature, where Democratic lawmakers had repeatedly attempted to pass legislation that would explicitly include sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression under the scope of discrimination protections. However, these efforts were consistently blocked by Republican lawmakers.

The regulation came about through a process involving a regulatory gatekeeper agency, which approved the new rule after receiving input from various stakeholders. The regulation’s approval marked a significant victory for LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, who had long pushed for these additional protections, especially for transgender individuals who often face discrimination in housing, employment, and public spaces.

Impact of the Lawsuit

The lawsuit’s potential impact is significant, particularly for the LGBTQ+ community in Pennsylvania. If the courts side with the plaintiffs, it could severely limit the state’s ability to protect individuals from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. This could also set a precedent for other states looking to roll back similar protections.

The issue of transgender athletes competing in women’s sports is a hotly debated topic in Pennsylvania and across the U.S., with opponents arguing that transgender women have an unfair advantage over cisgender women in some sports. Supporters of transgender rights, however, argue that inclusive policies are necessary to ensure that transgender individuals have equal opportunities and protections.

Next Steps

The lawsuit is still in its early stages, and it remains to be seen how the courts will address the broader implications of expanding anti-discrimination laws. Legal experts predict that the case could be one of several in the coming years challenging LGBTQ+ protections across the country, particularly as conservative lawmakers continue to push back against policies they view as overreaching.

For now, both sides of the debate continue to press forward, with LGBTQ+ advocates watching closely as Pennsylvania’s legal system examines the scope and future of anti-discrimination protections in the state.

The case is expected to proceed over the coming months, and its outcome could have broader implications for how LGBTQ+ individuals are protected under state laws, particularly regarding discrimination and participation in high school sports.

Madonna Blasts Trump’s Anti-Trans Policies, Slams ‘Lynch Mob Mentality’ in Powerful Instagram Message

0

Music icon Madonna is once again voicing her strong opposition to the policies of former President Donald Trump, condemning his executive orders targeting the LGBTQ+ community, particularly those affecting transgender individuals. In a passionate statement shared via Instagram on March 7, Madonna expressed her heartbreak over the ongoing discrimination faced by trans people under Trump’s administration.

Since taking office, Trump, now 78, has enacted a series of executive orders that have drawn significant criticism from LGBTQ+ advocates. These include restrictions on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and a controversial ban on transgender individuals serving in the military.

Madonna, a long-time advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, has regularly spoken out against what she describes as the administration’s “bigotry” toward the LGBTQ+ community. In her latest statement, the pop legend lamented the harsh treatment transgender people have endured, questioning how those in power could fail to understand the struggles of marginalized groups.

“How can we know what it feels like? Have we walked in their shoes?” Madonna wrote in her Instagram story. “The lynch mob mentality in this country is at an all-time high. The excitement people get from watching others go down or be silenced, be blacklisted, is disturbing.”

Photo: Instagram/@Madonna
Photo: Instagram/@Madonna

The 65-year-old star continued by condemning those who take pleasure in the suffering of others, calling such behavior a “sin.” She emphasized the importance of empathy and compassion, urging humanity to focus on uplifting those who strive to be better versions of themselves.

“Humanity should put more time and effort into lifting people up and supporting anyone who is striving to be the better version of themselves,” Madonna added.

Her comments came in the wake of a controversial speech made by Trump on March 4, during his address to Congress. In his remarks, Trump once again targeted the LGBTQ+ community, falsely claiming that the previous Democratic administration had spent millions of dollars attempting to create “transgender mice.” This false claim, which quickly gained traction on social media, was debunked by fact-checkers. CNN clarified that the funding in question was for studies analyzing the effects of hormones on preexisting health conditions, such as asthma—not for the creation of “transgender mice.”

Despite the falsehoods, the rhetoric has only fueled Madonna’s resolve to stand up for the rights of transgender individuals. This is not the first time she has spoken out against the Trump administration. In January, she posted a similar message on X (formerly Twitter), expressing her dismay at the Republican president’s dismantling of protections for marginalized groups. At the time, she urged LGBTQ+ individuals not to “give up the fight.”

Madonna’s continued advocacy for the LGBTQ+ community comes as a reminder of her longstanding commitment to social justice. Throughout her career, she has used her platform to challenge inequality and amplify the voices of those who are often silenced.

The pop star’s latest remarks have sparked widespread support from her followers, many of whom have praised her for remaining steadfast in her support of the LGBTQ+ community. As the political landscape continues to shift, Madonna’s voice remains a powerful ally in the ongoing fight for equality and acceptance.

The former queen of pop has made it clear that her advocacy will not waver, even in the face of divisive political climates and continued attacks on LGBTQ+ rights. “Don’t give up the fight,” she urged her followers, echoing a message of resilience and hope for a more inclusive future.

Gay MAGA Influencer Dies After Series of Accidents, Legal Woes, and Shocking Revelations

0

Influencer and social media personality Bruno, known for his popular Garrett Travels account with 61,000 followers, has passed away following a series of accidents and legal challenges.

The 33-year-old influencer was involved in a serious crash earlier this year, but only days after his release from the hospital, he suffered a second accident while riding a scooter. On October 19, just nine days after the initial crash, Bruno was photographed by DailyMail.com outside his West Hollywood home, appearing to snort a substance in broad daylight. He later claimed the powder was prescription ketamine in a post on his Instagram account.

Garrett Bruno and his dog, Boone, on a hike. Photo: Instagram/@garrett.travels
Garrett Bruno and his dog, Boone, on a hike. Photo: Instagram/@garrett.travels

Less than a week later, on October 25, Bruno fell off his scooter and sustained a severe head injury, cracking his skull. The influencer was rushed to Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Beverly Hills, where he was placed in a coma. His condition was critical, and it was unclear whether he would survive the injury.

Bruno’s troubles did not end with his medical crisis. On November 15, deputies from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office raided his West Hollywood home in connection with the murder of a man named Abouab. They were unable to arrest Bruno due to his hospitalization, though the investigation continued.

Bruno regained consciousness in late December 2024, after spending several weeks in a coma. He was transferred to an LA jail to face charges related to the murder investigation. However, by January 2025, Bruno had been released on bail while awaiting trial.

Tragically, just before his trial was set to begin, Bruno died. According to reports, he had flown to Florida to be with his family at the time of his death. The cause of death has not yet been confirmed.

Bruno’s life took a surprising turn in 2024 when he publicly revealed his support for the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement. His announcement shocked many, particularly within the LGBT community in West Hollywood, where he had been known for his advocacy on various social issues.

His unexpected death has left the social media community stunned, with many fans and followers paying tribute to him online. Despite his controversial public persona and the tumultuous events leading up to his passing, Bruno remains a figure remembered for his influence on social media and his impact on the LGBTQ+ community.

An official investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death is ongoing.

Lady Gaga Celebrates LGBTQ+ Resilience and Her Own Evolution in ‘Mayhem’ Era

Lady Gaga has consistently reshaped the pop landscape with each album, from the glitzy rise of The Fame to the emotional depth of Joanne and the sci-fi fantasy of Chromatica. Now, with her highly anticipated seventh studio album, Mayhem, the superstar turns the focus inward, reflecting on the shape of her own stardom and embracing her true artistry.

In an interview with Out, Gaga describes Mayhem as “a lot of gothic dreams,” a theme that has quietly resonated throughout her career. “I’ve realized that’s been a part of my music since early in my career,” she explains, suggesting that the album marks an exploration of her own evolution as both an artist and a person.

At 38, Gaga feels a renewed sense of confidence in her musical journey. “As a pop star, I want to be able to celebrate the parts of myself that I know will carry me forward,” she says, comfortably relaxing under a blanket with sunlight streaming in. She recalls advice from legendary jazz singer Tony Bennett, who urged her to focus on quality. “If the thing that I focus on for the rest of my career is my musicianship, that will be a way for me to move forward, and with confidence,” Gaga reflects.

Throughout her career, Gaga has cemented herself not only as a defining figure of pop culture but also as a multifaceted artist, admired for her musicianship and her willingness to push boundaries. “I’m not sure if people know that I’ve been producing all my albums my whole career. I’ve always been a co-producer and writer on my records. I just feel more comfortable talking about it now,” she reveals. “I’m also really proud of this music. I’m very proud of the production on this album.”

In a world dominated by social media feeds, trending topics, and viral moments, Gaga has long tackled the intersection of fame, artifice, and identity—issues she first delved into with ARTPOP in 2013. Yet, in 2025, as artists and brands navigate an increasingly polarized social landscape, Gaga continues to thrive. At the Grammy Awards, she earned a Grammy for Best Pop Duo/Group Performance with the hauntingly romantic track “Die With a Smile,” which closes out Mayhem. During her acceptance speech, Gaga used the opportunity to speak out on behalf of the trans community, reiterating her commitment to supporting marginalized voices.

That same night, Gaga made another bold statement by releasing her new song “Abracadabra” and its accompanying music video during an ad break in the Grammy telecast. For her queer fans, the excitement was palpable. “It means the absolute world to me,” Gaga says, visibly moved. “I can’t even begin to tell you how grateful I am, and what it means to be supported by a community that I respect so much. A community that is responsible for so much great art for thousands of years.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVYsHZcaBUw

Gaga’s continued support for the LGBTQ+ community is not just an underlying current in her music, but a defining element of her public persona. “It really means a lot,” she adds, “and I hope that I made something that the LGBTQ+ community felt was also indicative of the resilience that I see in queer people all the time.”

Though many would consider the support of allies to be a given, Gaga continues to make her commitment to the queer community front and center in her career. “I just want to say that I love you so much,” she tells Out. “And I thank you for your endless amounts of love, inspiration, and strength. Thank you for teaching the world how to be kind, and to love. And know that I’m going to have the back of the LGBTQ+ community every single day.”

Gaga pauses before continuing: “Actually, I think my message wouldn’t necessarily be to the queer community. It would be to everyone else: You can learn a lot from the queer community about love.”

As she embarks on this new era, Gaga continues to use her platform not only to create art but to advocate for love, inclusion, and strength—values that have always been at the core of her music and public persona. Mayhem is a reflection of her personal and artistic growth, blending the gothic with the glamorous as she shapes the next chapter of her career, staying true to the very parts of herself that have defined her journey.

Michelle Buteau Faces ‘Big Life Decision’ in First Trailer for ‘Survival of the Thickest’ Season 2

0

Mavis Beaumont’s journey continues to take unexpected turns in the upcoming season of Survival of the Thickest, with the new trailer offering a glimpse into her evolving life and relationships. Played by Michelle Buteau, who co-created the series alongside Danielle Sanchez-Witzel, Buteau returns as the bold, confident, and unapologetically plus-size woman navigating her career, love life, and personal growth.

In Survival of the Thickest season 2 on Netflix, Mavis travels to Rome in an attempt to prove her love for Luca, played by Marouane Zotti. But, as teased in the trailer, things don’t go as planned, and Mavis finds herself back in New York City seeking solace from her two best friends, Khalil (Tone Bell) and Marley (Tasha Smith). Despite her emotional setbacks, Mavis has a light-hearted moment where she announces, “I was a zombie but now I’m back from the dead!” as she embraces a new chapter of her life.

Season 2 focuses on Mavis turning the page on her 30s with confidence, fun, and a few unexpected twists. In a pivotal moment from the trailer, Mavis celebrates turning 39, excited about embracing the upcoming year. “Can I just say, 39 is going to be an amazing year! Why was I so scared of it?” she asks, while also getting a glimpse of Khalil’s curiosity about her desire for motherhood. Tasha Smith’s character, Marley, quickly steps in to defend Mavis, reminding Khalil that her questions about Mavis’ personal life might not be the best for the occasion.

A key theme in Survival of the Thickest season 2 is Mavis’ continued passion for plus-size fashion. As she makes a career pivot to designing clothes for plus-size consumers, Mavis proudly declares, “Thick girls, we ain’t just the moment, we the movement, honey!” In her quest to make high-fashion a reality for larger bodies, Mavis embarks on a business partnership with Marley, who appears to have her own blossoming romance this season. “It’s been a long time since I felt like this,” Marley says before sharing a kiss, signaling a deeper emotional arc for the character.

For Khalil, season 2 will offer a unique opportunity to break down emotional barriers. As he struggles with a creative block, Khalil decides to attend therapy, something not commonly seen for Black men on TV. Tone Bell reflected on the significance of this storyline, telling People, “You don’t really see that often. You get a chance to see him speak to, I would say, multiple groups about it and then not being embarrassed about talking about it. I think that’s really cool.” Bell continued, adding that Khalil’s vulnerability is part of his personal growth, as he encourages Mavis to chase her dreams and gives advice to Marley as she navigates her own relationship challenges.

In the midst of personal growth, Mavis’ friendship with Marley will be tested as the two women enter into a business partnership. Tasha Smith teased some tension between the characters, noting that there would be a “hiccup” in their dynamic. However, as the actress teased, “But they work it out. She’s just that bitch!”

Survival of the Thickest season 2 promises to be a season filled with laughs, heartfelt moments, and an exploration of the complexities of friendship, love, and self-empowerment. Viewers can look forward to more personal and professional growth for Mavis, as well as deeper storylines for Khalil and Marley.

Season 2 of Survival of the Thickest premieres on Netflix on March 27, offering fans the chance to see how Mavis and her friends navigate new chapters in their lives, their careers, and their relationships.

As always, Michelle Buteau’s portrayal of Mavis brings heart, humor, and authenticity to the screen, making this season one fans won’t want to miss.

U.S. Retailers Quietly Maintain DEI Efforts Despite Public Rollbacks

0

Several U.S. retailers that publicly scaled back their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs — including Target, Amazon, and Tractor Supply — continue to support certain DEI initiatives behind the scenes, raising questions about the tension between public and private commitments to diversity.

Although companies like Target and Amazon have ended or restructured certain DEI programs on paper, many have assured advocacy groups and individuals that they will continue funding LGBTQ+ Pride and racial justice events, as well as supporting internal resource groups for underrepresented employees. This contradiction between public statements made to investors and private conversations with advocacy groups reveals the delicate balancing act companies are attempting to perform amid growing political and legal pressures.

“Companies are trying to thread the needle — stay true to corporate values, satisfy various stakeholders, but reduce legal risk,” said Jason C. Schwartz, an employment law partner at Gibson Dunn who advises corporate clients on DEI issues. “It’s a challenging time for companies trying to maintain a strong commitment to DEI while navigating the current political climate.”

Tractor Supply, a retailer that sells home and garden supplies, made headlines earlier this year when it ended a DEI program focused on increasing representation of people of color in management and enhancing support for Black education initiatives. The company also stopped collecting diversity data for the Human Rights Campaign‘s Corporate Equality Index, which evaluates businesses on their treatment of LGBTQ+ employees and customers. A spokesperson for Tractor Supply said the company had made a “purposeful decision” to remove what it considered “perceived political and social agendas” from its operations.

However, Keayana Robinson, the contractor who led the company’s diversity data collection, said Tractor Supply offered to keep her on in a new, undefined role related to DEI. Robinson added that management assured her the company’s internal diversity initiatives, including support for resource groups for underrepresented employees, would continue. Robinson, however, declined the offer, saying she did not want to work for a company that “wants to hide me.”

Target also announced in January that it would no longer participate in the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index and eliminated a DEI program aimed at increasing the number of Black employees by 20% over three years. A spokesperson for Target emphasized the company’s shift in focus, stating that its new approach was geared toward increasing relevance with U.S. consumers and attracting top talent.

Despite these changes, Target’s commitment to diversity remains a topic of concern for some advocates. Sharon Smith-Akinsanya, CEO of Rae Mackenzie Group, met with Target executives after the company scaled back its DEI efforts. Smith-Akinsanya, who organizes career events for people of color in Minnesota, said she was reassured by Target’s leadership but noted that the company’s actions were still troubling.

“Target’s DNA remains intact, and I believe in their commitment to diversity,” Smith-Akinsanya said, adding that she understands the political challenges faced by companies in today’s climate.

However, some advocacy groups are taking a firmer stance. Andi Otto, executive director of Twin Cities Pride, said the organization declined a $50,000 sponsorship from Target this year after nearly two decades of partnership. Otto cited concerns over Target’s retreat from DEI programs and the removal of some Pride Month products in 2023. “Target can’t have it both ways,” Otto said, referring to the company’s public reassurances coupled with its policy changes.

Similarly, Sheletta Brundidge, a Black business leader, dropped Amazon as a sponsor of her annual Black Entrepreneurs Day after learning about the company’s rollbacks in DEI programs. Brundidge recounted a phone call in which Amazon representatives attempted to downplay the changes, but she remained firm in her decision to sever ties.

Despite these controversies, some companies are sticking to their DEI commitments, even in the face of legal and political pressures. In February, investors at Apple voted against a proposal to curtail DEI efforts during the company’s shareholder meeting. A day later, former President Donald Trump criticized Apple for its DEI policies on social media. Although Apple did not respond directly to the comments, the company has maintained that it is committed to fostering a culture of inclusion, belonging, and collaboration.

Costco Wholesale also faced a challenge in January when its shareholders voted against a proposal to limit DEI initiatives. Following this, 19 Republican state attorneys general demanded that Costco clarify its stance on DEI policies. The company has not publicly responded to requests for comment.

The list of companies pulling back from DEI programs has grown in recent months, with notable names including Walmart, PepsiCo, McDonald’s, and John Deere. Some of these companies have confirmed changes to their DEI strategies, while others have yet to provide detailed responses.

Lawyers suggest that companies are navigating a complex landscape, considering both legal and political risks when deciding which DEI programs to retain. “Companies are essentially picking their battles,” said Schwartz. “They’re trying to avoid battles altogether while trying to maintain their core values.”

As these retailers walk a fine line between public and private commitments, the future of DEI programs in the corporate world remains uncertain. While some companies continue to support diversity initiatives quietly, others face growing pressure from both advocates and political figures to either fully embrace or scale back their DEI efforts.

Do We Really Still Think That Dylan Efron Doesn’t Shower After This Playful Speedo Post?

0

Dylan Efron, the younger brother of actor Zac Efron, has recently stirred up conversation with some surprising comments about personal hygiene — specifically, showering. Known for his laid-back attitude and unorthodox opinions, Dylan took to social media to make an eyebrow-raising statement: “I think people shower too much. We take way too many showers… We don’t need to soap our bodies every time we’re in the shower, either. That’s way too much!”

At first, many fans may have questioned whether Dylan was just making a lighthearted remark, but the actor and reality star didn’t stop there. To emphasize his point and back up his words, Dylan decided to showcase his philosophy in true Efron fashion. He posted an Instagram Story showing him standing under a stream of water while wearing nothing but a speedo. The shot quickly went viral, leaving many fans amused and others curious about his shower habits.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Bravo Bri (@bravobravobravobri)

Dylan’s decision to strip down to a speedo and show the world how a shower should be done certainly added an aesthetic appeal to his point. The combination of his carefree attitude and eye-catching demonstration had fans applauding his confidence — not to mention the added bonus of some unexpected eye candy. While his comments about showering might have seemed strange to some, his playful approach to the topic has certainly made an impact.

This moment wasn’t just about making a splash on social media. It was about challenging traditional norms surrounding cleanliness and self-care. While many people are accustomed to daily showers, often using soap for an extensive cleanse, Dylan’s unconventional stance encourages people to rethink how often and how thoroughly they wash.

Dylan’s fans were quick to respond, with some supporting his less-is-more approach and others laughing along with the humor of his delivery. As for the Speedo-clad shower demonstration, it appears that Dylan is not just trying to make a statement about personal hygiene, but also about self-expression and body confidence. Whether you agree with his take on soap or not, there’s no denying that Dylan’s charismatic personality and willingness to break the mold make him a standout figure.

Regardless of whether his shower philosophy gains widespread approval, it’s clear that Dylan has captured attention. The upcoming finale of The Traitors on Peacock is sure to further elevate his profile, but for now, he’s winning fans over with a mix of charm, humor, and a well-timed speedo shower.